Are we accelerating innovation or running in place?

Executive Director & Partner

In collaboration with August, we hosted a thoughtful discussion exploring what it takes to innovate in a world where consumer expectations, technological capabilities, and business pressures are all accelerating at once. As organizations race to move faster, leaders are grappling with a difficult balancing act: how do you stay agile and responsive without sacrificing rigor, creativity, or long-term thinking?

To unpack these tensions, we brought together Caitlin Berzok, SVP of Digital at Therabody, and Annette Radiszewski, Director of Brand Innovation at KIND Snacks, for a candid conversation. Drawing from their experiences across consumer products, health technology, and digital innovation, the panelists shared how their teams are navigating speed, ambiguity, AI adoption, and the realities of bringing meaningful products to market.

01 Innovation requires more than speed

Both panelists emphasized that innovation is not simply about moving faster. Sustainable innovation requires organizations to balance agility with structure, clarity, and operational realities. The conversation highlighted how company size shapes those realities. Larger organizations often have more resources, stronger infrastructure, and deeper institutional knowledge, but those advantages can also create friction when trying to move quickly or experiment with new ideas.

Annette described the challenge many established companies face when trying to accelerate systems originally designed for scale and consistency rather than agility. Caitlin echoed that the challenge at Therabody is not a lack of momentum, but determining which opportunities are actually worth pursuing in an environment filled with endless possibilities and consumer data. Both leaders stressed that slowing down at the right moments can ultimately create a stronger foundation for faster execution later.

02 Strong innovation starts with defining the right problem

A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the importance of deeply understanding consumer needs before jumping to solutions. Rather than chasing technology or trends for their own sake, both organizations focus on identifying meaningful problems they are uniquely positioned to solve.

For KIND, innovation means delivering new food experiences that align with evolving consumer behaviors, nutritional needs, and cultural trends. For Therabody, it means creating products that help people move better, feel better, and look better, always grounded in measurable therapeutic benefit. In both cases, consumer relevance drives the innovation process more than competitive pressure alone.

When we start with what the solution should be rather than what the problem is, I think that’s when we can get in this preconceived trap.
Caitlin Berzok
SVP of Digital at Therabody

03 AI is most valuable as a tool for acceleration, not replacement

The panelists offered a nuanced perspective on AI, recognizing both its potential and its limitations. Rather than viewing AI as a replacement for human thinking, they described it as a tool that can reduce manual work, speed up analysis, and create more room for strategic and creative problem-solving.

Caitlin shared how Therabody is experimenting with AI across areas like consumer insight analysis, qualitative testing, and internal workflows, while still maintaining strong guardrails and human oversight. Annette described how KIND Snacks is using AI-powered sensory testing to extrapolate broader consumer insights from smaller prototype testing groups, helping reduce time and resource demands without sacrificing confidence in the results.

Panelists highlighted growing concerns around intellectual property and data privacy, particularly when using public AI tools. Caitlin noted that Therabody relies on enterprise AI environments with closed systems and internal structures to safely experiment with proprietary information. They noted the importance of evaluation and discernment, reinforcing that successful AI adoption depends as much on human judgment as it does on the technology itself.

04 Clear alignment across teams is critical for execution

As ideas move from concept to commercialization, organizational alignment becomes one of the biggest determinants of success. Annette emphasized that innovation efforts work best when teams rally around a shared objective while still having the flexibility to apply their own expertise.

Caitlin similarly noted that innovation initiatives often fail when execution teams are brought in too late. Including downstream teams early in the process helps build ownership, surface operational realities, and increase the likelihood that new ideas can successfully scale within the business.

When we have a clear common objective that is narrowly enough defined that it gives our cross-functional teams parameters to work within, but there’s ultimate clarity on what we’re trying to achieve, that’s when things work really well.
Annette Radziszewski
Director, Brand Innovation at Kind

Creating room for innovation means building organizations that can adapt

As the discussion made clear, innovation today is not simply about generating more ideas or adopting the latest technology. It is about building organizations that can navigate ambiguity, align around meaningful consumer needs, and create the conditions for thoughtful experimentation at scale. Whether through clearer problem definition, smarter AI adoption, or stronger cross-functional collaboration, the companies best positioned for the future will be the ones that balance speed with intentionality.

Let’s design a smarter world together